Tuesday, May 31, 2016

The NASI – Scopus Young Scientist Award 2016

 
The Scopus Young Scientist Awards were first launched by Elsevier in 2006. In 2009, India officially adopted the program within its scientific community through Elsevier's collaboration with NASI. The program honors young researchers who are building their careers in academic research, helping them gain recognition for their work.
 
The NASI – Scopus Young Scientist of the year will receive:
A citation & a plaque
Cash prize of INR 75,000
 
Awards will be given in the following 9 areas of Science, Technology & Medicine:
Agriculture
Biological sciences
Chemistry
Earth, Oceanographic & Environmental Studies
Engineering
Mathematics
Medicine
Physics
Social Sciences
 
Criteria for Application
An Indian citizen, residing and working in India
Have completed atleast PhD/MD or equivalent degree
Must be born on or after January 1st, 1976.
 
Application process
The candidates who fulfill the above criteria can fill the application form, take a print and along with the desired documents (mention in the application form), send it to:
Manish Uniyal
Marketing Manager
Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd.
14th Floor, Building No. 10B
DLF Cyber City, Phase II, Gurgaon- 122002, Haryana
 
Recommendations for your work would be appreciated and can give you an edge over others but is optional. If you have any recommendation for your work, download the recommendation form from link below. Get it filled from recommending person and send it along with your application.
Note: Maximum of two Recommendations per application is allowed.
 
The last date for physical receipt of the application is 15th June, 2016.
For Application Form,
Click Here
For Recommendation Form,
Click Here
Last year’s NASI-Scopus Young Scientist Awards program attracted nearly 650 applications from premier research Institutions across India. A panel of 32 subject experts from India's academic community judged the applications, using quantitative analyses from Scopus data provided by Elsevier. Additional criteria the judges used included:
Quality and number of publications
Nature and uniqueness of research
Outcomes of research
Impact on society
Vision of the researcher